SEC Form 4/A · accession 0001209191-17-023646
E.W. SCRIPPS Co · SSP
Statement of changes in beneficial ownership, as filed. Original on EDGAR ↗
This is an amendment (Form 4/A). It replaces an earlier filing for the same period.
Reporting owner
Mark L Koors
Officer — VP/Audit and Compliance
Period of report
Mar 9, 2017
Accepted (ET)
Mar 30, 2017 · 1:58 pm EDT
Rule 10b5-1 plan
unknown — predates the checkbox
Issuer CIK
0000832428
Table I — non-derivative securities
| Security | Date | Code | Shares | Price | A/D | Owned after | D/I | Nature of ownership |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Class A Common Shares, $.01 par value per share | Mar 9, 2017 | C | 4,459 | $22.97 | A | 37,871 | D | |
| Class A Common Shares, $.01 par value per shareF3 | Mar 9, 2017 | F | 1,616 | $22.97 | D | 36,255 | D | |
| Common Voting Shares, $.01 par value per share | holding | — | — | — | 0 | D |
Table II — derivative securities
| Security | Conv. / exercise price | Date | Code | Shares | A/D | Exercisable | Expires | Underlying | Underlying shares | Owned after | D/I |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Restricted Stock UnitsF1 | — | Mar 9, 2017 | C | 1,367 | D | Mar 9, 2015 | Mar 9, 2017 | Restricted Stock Units | 1,367 | 0 | D |
| Restricted Stock UnitsF1 | — | Mar 9, 2017 | C | 1,624 | D | Mar 9, 2016 | Mar 9, 2018 | Restricted Stock Units | 1,624 | 1,624 | D |
| Restricted Stock UnitsF4 | — | Feb 21, 2017 | J | 2,938 | D | Mar 9, 2017 | Mar 9, 2019 | Restricted Stock Units | 2,938 | 4,406 | D |
| Restricted Stock UnitsF1 | — | Mar 9, 2017 | C | 1,468 | D | Mar 9, 2017 | Mar 9, 2019 | Restricted Stock Units | 1,468 | 2,938 | D |
Explanation of responses
- F1This transaction reflects the conversion of restricted stock units into Class A Common Shares.
- F2The terms of this long-term incentive award mandate that the Company withhold shares to satisfy the reporting person's tax obligation.
- F3A clerical error occurred when entering the price per share.
- F4Forty percent of the units awarded in 2016 were contingent on performance measures. Because the company did not meet these measures, the subject units did not vest and were forfeited under terms of the award.